After Warning the U.S. Will Act, Trump Orders Military to Draft Greenland Plan
Donald Trump’s alleged requests for military contingency plans involving Greenland have heightened concerns over his persistent focus on the Arctic territory. While no official order is confirmed, sources indicate he has explored options, including potential military scenarios, alarming officials in Washington and among allies.
Trump has long emphasized Greenland’s strategic importance, previously suggesting the U.S. might acquire it. Recently, his rhetoric intensified, implying unilateral action to secure American interests, despite objections from Greenland or allies. This stance has strained transatlantic relations.
Denmark, which manages Greenland’s foreign and defense policy, reacted with concern. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned such threats against a NATO ally risk undermining the alliance, firmly stating Greenland is not for sale and that such suggestions violate international norms.
Diplomatic efforts to ease tensions are ongoing. Danish and Greenlandic officials plan meetings with U.S. counterparts, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, to reaffirm dialogue.
Trump denies making a formal purchase offer but frames U.S. involvement as a defensive necessity. He cites growing Russian and Chinese Arctic activity, portraying Greenland as a geopolitical asset needing American protection.
Within the U.S. government, the reported plans face resistance. Military and legal advisers question their legality and feasibility, noting Greenland’s protected status under NATO and international agreements. Bipartisan congressional skepticism highlights that any force would require legal authorization.
Analysts warn such speculation could destabilize the traditionally cooperative Arctic region. Coercive action might fracture NATO, damage U.S. credibility, and benefit adversaries. Whether Trump’s stance is genuine or rhetorical remains unclear, but it has undeniably thrust Greenland into the center of global tensions.
